Solidago ssp. (the Goldenrods)

Online help for the identification of Goldenrods can be found at these sites: 1, 2, 3, 4—and Goldenrod galls at these sites: 1, 2, 3, 4.

Occurance: The USDA plant site reports 75 species and 144 taxa (in the U.S.) for the Genus Solidago—thirteen species are shown in Iowa.

In The Vascular Plants of Iowa Eilers and Roosa report that fourteen species of Solidago have been found in Iowa. However, three of these species S. ptarmicoides, S. riddellii, and S. rigida are sometimes placed in the genus Oligoneuron —as Oligoneuron album, Oligoneuron riddellii, and Oligoneuron rigidum, respectively (See USDA website). One species, S. altissima, was previously considered a separate species—then it was considered to be a variety of S. canadensis (S. canadensis var. scabra). Now, according to the Flora of North America (FNA) it is considered a single species again, but with two subspecies (subsp. altissima and subsp. gilvocanescens. The grass-leaved goldenrod (S. graminifolia) has moved to the genus Euthamia and is now known as Euthamia graminifolia (common goldentop). As of March 2017, a new species, Solidago jejunifolia, has been added to the list of Iowa goldenrods. At this writing, FNA still has it listed as a synonym for Solidago speciosa.

Distribution information for the U.S. is available at BONAP and for Iowa at An Illustrated Guide to Iowa Prairie Plants. Nine species—indicated below in bold font—have been reported in Johnson county. Finally, at the top of this page is a navigation bar with a link to "Plant inventories". If you have an unknown plant that was found in one of the inventoried areas you can compare it to the plants already known to have existed in that area.

Solidago, like Aster, is one of our most difficult genera. Natural hybridization frequently occurs and the species are also highly plastic. For proper study full specimens, showing subterranean parts and basal leaves as well as the whole flowering stem, are essential. Identification of fragmentary specimens is safe only after long familiarity with the group.
Gray's Manual of Botany Eighth Edition (footnnote Page 1381).

Goldenrod Species in Iowa

Solidago altissima - Tall goldenrod, Late goldenrod

Solidago canadensis - Canada Goldenrod

Solidago flexicaulis - Zig-Zag Goldenrod

Solidago gigantea - Smooth Goldenrod

Solidago hispida - Hairy Goldenrod

Solidago missouriensis - Missouri Goldenrod

Solidago nemoralis - Gray Goldenrod

Solidago patula - Roundleaf Goldenrod

Solidago ptarmicoides (Oligoneuron album) - Prairie Goldenrod

Solidago riddellii (Oligoneuron riddellii) - Riddell's Goldenrod

Solidago rigida (Oligoneuron rigidum) - Stiff-leaved Goldenrod

Solidago sciaphila - Cliff Goldenrod

Solidago speciosa - Showy Goldenrod

Solidago uliginosa - Swamp Goldenrod

Solidago ulmifolia - Elm-leaved Goldenrod

Euthamia graminifolia - (Solidago graminifolia) Grass-leaved Goldenrod

Clues to Identification (for the nine species in Johnson county, IA):

1) Three species are short plants usually less than 3 feet tall—S. flexicaulis (prefers mesic woodlands), S. missouriensis (prefers open plains), and S. nemoralis (prefers sterile soils and old fields). S. flexicaulis may have a zig-zag stem and its leaves are more than 3 cm wide (ovate, petioled, and dentate). S. missouriensis leaves are less than 2.5 cm wide and linear-lanceolate.(cauline leaves oblanceolate decreasing in size from base to inflorescence).

2) The four taller species are generally taller than 3 feet—usually around 5 feet tall. Three of these are often confused: S. gigantea, S. altissima, and S. canadensis. These are sometimes collectively referred to as the tall goldenrods. The taxonomy of these species is uncertain and some botanists prefer to treat two of them as one by making S. altissima a variety of S. canadensis. Since the FNA regards them as three separate species, we will take their approach here. They are usually distinguished by the hairiness of their stems and the size of their floral involucres. S. gigantea has smooth (hairless) often redish stems below the inflorescence. S. canadensis has hairy stems below the inflorescence but the hairs diminish and disappear further down the stem. S. altissima has hairy stems throughout the plant.

The floral heads are smaller on S. canadensis. The length of its involucres range from 1.7 to 2.5 mm. Those of the other two species are 2.5-4 mm long. The number of disc florets per head provide another distinction. For S. gigantea the number is 7-12 compared to 3-6 in the two other species. Finally, the laminae (fused petals) of the ray florets tend to be longer than 1.5 mm for S. gigantea and 1.5 mm or less in the other two species.

The fourth member of the tall species is S. speciosa usually less than 4 feet tall with thick narrow leaves and reddish stems.

3) Two species seem different enough from the rest to be considered for inclusion in different genera.
These are first, S. rigida (Oligoneuron rigidum) which has two kinds of leaves, relatively large and petioled basal leaves and smaller cauline leaves which are often directed upward along the stem; and second, S. graminifolia (Euthamia graminifolia) which has three veins running the length of its grass like leaves.

4) S. speciosa and S. nemaralis have leaves that are largest at the bottom and are progressively smaller moving up the stem. Beneath the inflorescence, S. speciosa is smooth stemmed while S. nemoralis has pubescent stems.

5) Only two species of goldenrod are known to routinely play host to the gall forming fly (Eurosta solidaginis). These are S. altissima (with hairy stems) and S. gigantea (with smooth, sometimes purplish, stems). Apparently, the fly finds S. canadensis rarely suitable for its purposes. There is information about this relationship on the 37 minute video - The Goldenrod and the Gallfly.

Interestingly, some members of the S. altissima and S. gigantea species have evolved a method called "ducking" which dissuades the Eurosta fly from depositing its eggs in these plants. S. canadensis, which is not bothered by the Eurosta fly, appears not to have evolved this technique but may have evolved another (as yet undiscovered) method that makes it unappealing to the fly.